Dana Baidaulet vs Nasiba Espolova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L L W L L
Form
L L W W L L W L W LHead-To-Head: Baidaulet 1 - 0 Espolova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Baidaulet winning 2 and Espolova winning 0. The last match between Baidaulet and Espolova was at the W15 Ust-Kamenogorsk, 29-07-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Dana Baidaulet getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dana Baidaulet | 1 |
| Nasiba Espolova | 0 |
W15 Ust-Kamenogorsk(29-07-2024)
6
3
6
1
| Baidaulet | Stats | Espolova |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (1-1) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 19 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 42% (27-38) | Career Total W/L | 28% (12-31) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kartal VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Dana Baidaulet
Player
Nasiba Espolova
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:7:0 | Average Match Time | 1:7:0 |
| 71% (40/56) | 1st Serve % | 68% (27/40) |
| 68% (27/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 50% (8/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6/13) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 57% (23/40) | Return Points Win % | 38% (21/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dana Baidaulet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 1-6 7-6(5) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Varvara Panshina
Player
Dana Baidaulet
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dana Baidaulet
Player
Nasiba Espolova
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Defne Cirpanli
Player
Dana Baidaulet
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margaux Maquet
Player
Dana Baidaulet
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eleanor Dean
Player
Dana Baidaulet
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Kaili Demi Teso
Player
Dana Baidaulet
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-7(2) 6-1 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Valeriya Yushchenko
Player
Dana Baidaulet
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nasiba Espolova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Pooja Ingale
Player
Nasiba Espolova
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Khomutsianskaya
Player
Nasiba Espolova
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nasiba Espolova
Player
Varvara Bernovich
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
40 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(5) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dana Baidaulet
Player
Nasiba Espolova
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Sukhotina
Player
Nasiba Espolova
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nasiba Espolova
Player
Diana Maria Mihail
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nasiba Espolova
Player
Aisulu Zholbolat
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shria Atturu
Player
Nasiba Espolova
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasiya Poplavska
Player
Nasiba Espolova
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42% (27/38) | Win/Loss | 28% (12/31) |
| 42% (60/83) | Sets Win/Loss | 27% (25/67) |
| 45% (578/693) | Games Win/Loss | 37% (302/509) |
| 26% (5/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 19% (3/13) |
| 51% (19/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 32% (7/15) |
| 33% (3/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 30 | Aces Total | 13 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 189 | Total Double Faults | 98 |
| 1:4:48 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 315.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 236.07 |
| 59% (1574/2690) | 1st Serve % | 62% (960/1537) |
| 54% (856/1574) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (501/960) |
| 39% (438/1116) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (233/577) |
| 49% (149/305) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (70/153) |
| 45% (1146/2557) | Return Points Win % | 42% (662/1559) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (3/12) | Challenger W/L | 18% (2/9) |
| 49% (24/25) | Futures W/L | 32% (10/21) |
| 40% (25/63) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 28% (12/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (3/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 46% (6/13) | Deciding Set Win % | 83% (5/6) |
| 83% (30/25) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (10/9) |
| 17% (30/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (10/1) |
| 6% (35/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (33/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
